I also thought forrest is a good product. But if it takes ages to generate the pages, we should move to something else.
I hate to say it, but sometime we really 'pay' (in terms of workarounds,
outages, time delays) for the decisions to go with forrest. I don't know if
we ought consider it 'yet another Gump stress test' and keep it, but I am
starting to think more and more of writing HTML pages directly, via some
Python code.
As you said, a pure python solution makes sense. Might be a lot of work though.
Talking of stress, gump.dotnot is taking almost a day...It cannot damage the server. Go for it !
http://gump.dotnot.org/#Details
I'm thinking of giving Gump a shot on moof. Do you think this is a good
idea, or just going to damage another server?
regards,Antoine
Adam
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
