The build of xdoclet is a masterpiece of complexity.
I wonder whether we should not rename the xdoclet project docs and invoke directly the build-docs.xml build file.
I would need to check in this case which properties we would have to set.
Cheers,
Antoine


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

antoine 2004/03/24 14:26:04

Modified: project xdoclet.xml
Log:
squeeze xjavadoc dependency checking
Revision Changes Path
1.64 +2 -0 gump/project/xdoclet.xml
Index: xdoclet.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/gump/project/xdoclet.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.63
retrieving revision 1.64
diff -u -r1.63 -r1.64
--- xdoclet.xml 2 Mar 2004 23:04:07 -0000 1.63
+++ xdoclet.xml 24 Mar 2004 22:26:04 -0000 1.64
@@ -143,6 +143,8 @@
<ant target="docs">
<property name="ant.home" project="ant" reference="home"/>
+ <!-- squeeze dependency checking for xjavadoc until build file allows us to say where xjavadoc is living -->
+ <property name="xjavadoc.uptodate" value="true"/>
<property name="version" value="@@DATE@@"/>
<depend name="xjavadoc.unicode.jar" project="xjavadoc"/>
</ant>







--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to