> +Currently our [http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/#Project+Summary success rate] > +is 75.34% with 592 projects.
It got into the 80s until one sole unit test in one project brought a bunch of stuff tumbling down, and it hasn't been fixed. :( Personally, I'm starting to but that we ought to gump on latest gump produced jars (so deeper project get a shot at (at least) finding their own mistakes, or ones they cause others). Other than technically (how to do this, or that this is imperfect) did any serious opposition occur to this idea? Pointer to a thread would be welcomed, as would a 'design decision' entry in the wiki... regards, Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
