> We build Log4J's 1.2 branch as well, not sure whether it would be a > good idea to use that, though.
There is a patch sitting in Bugzilla waiting to be applied by a commons-logging committer. Since it hasn't been done yet, I see no reason not to give this a shot (at least for today/tonight). I'll clone commons-logging to make commons-logging-on-log4j-CVS-HEAD and allow the former to use log4j-12. We can see what we get & revert this Hmm .. nice theory, unfortunately they'll both reside in the same directory. Not so good. For now I'll just change commons-logging (and keep an eye out for a change). If this approach fails I'll remove the log4j dependency & see how <option(al) it really is. regards, Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
