ajack 2004/05/24 22:54:21
Modified: blog/Issues GumpStorm.txt
Log:
Take two...
Revision Changes Path
1.2 +4 -20 gump/blog/Issues/GumpStorm.txt
Index: GumpStorm.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/gump/blog/Issues/GumpStorm.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- GumpStorm.txt 25 May 2004 05:35:24 -0000 1.1
+++ GumpStorm.txt 25 May 2004 05:54:21 -0000 1.2
@@ -17,27 +17,11 @@
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-->
-<B>History Repeating Itself</B>
-<P>
-About 6-7 years ago I was managing a small website for my mother on a local ISP.
-I had a ~/.foward in [EMAIL PROTECTED] as simple as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Everything
was fine until
-DNS guy at THEN_WORK_ADDRESS quit, and time went buy w/ unpaid Internic bills.
Suddenly that
-address was ripped from the Internet, no longer valid [within DNS cache].
-When a message was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from me, a CGI script), it was
returned (to me) along with a bounce notification. Two problems from one.
-Things degraded exponentially! It brought down the ISP (SendMail in a hard in
spin), and I was accused of intentional mail bombing.
-Not so, but tonight sure felt the same. :(
-</P>
-<P>
-Today, I disconnected early (lightening putting my sad modem at risk) and I just
re-joined. Uh oh ... way to much Gump mail!
-</P>
-<P>I'd attempted this:<BR/>
+<P>A <A HREF="http://gump.apache.org">Gump</A> change was commit to attempt:<BR/>
<A HREF="http://issues.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&msgNo=6870">Notification Mail Rework</A><BR/>
-Which was intended simply to ensure that Gump was a little more communicative, a
little more timely. I way over compensated...
-</P>
-<P>
-Unfortunately, the Ant bootstrap (old faithful, ultra reliable, solid base) failed
sending 456 projects into a state that
-incorrectly generated an e-mail. Another bad coincidence, another storm. History
repeating itself.
+Which was intended simply to ensure that Gump was a little more communicative, a
little more timely. It way over compensated...
</P>
<P>
-<B>Sorry folks...</B>
+Unfortunately, the Ant bootstrap failed sending 456 projects into a state that
+incorrectly generated an e-mail. Apologies for the noise...
</P>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]