Adam, I think this is a great idea!
I know it would be very useful to me, if the operational, day-to-day stuff were in a separate list from the discussion. As an interested party to continuous integration ideas and implementations, in general, I joined this group. But I find myself having to ignore a lot fo the operational mail about this checkin or some other automated nag. I don't run/use Gump myself, but am only interested in the technology. Hope this helps! Thanks, wade "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/03/2004 09:26:19 AM: > I was wondering if we have enough traffic on this list to warrant a split to > multiple lists. > > I've heard folks complain about traffic, and there are times it really > flurries. I worry that 'user' requests don't get the wide audience they > deserve due to overload w/ RTs & development ideas. > > I can think of three use cases (1) developing Gump [RTs and more] (2) > working with the Gump service [hey, I got nagged, what is this?] (3) > Personal Gumps. > > I know there are pros and cons to having multiple lists, but I think we've > reached a point where one list if overload. Perhaps the latter two are best > served by one, for now. I don't know if it is worth renaming general@ to be > dev@, I suspect not. > > As such, I think we ought add [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thoughts? > > BTW: Do we know how many addresses are subscribed to general, how many are > moderated in, and so forth? Just curious. > > regards, > > Adam > -- > Experience the Unwired Enterprise: > http://www.sybase.com/unwiredenterprise > Try Sybase: http://www.try.sybase.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
