Adam R. B. Jack wrote:

Go for it.

SVN rulez and it's very well integrated with IDEs now and many apache
projects are moving.



I read this to mean you'd like to see Gump migrated to SVN. I could read
your respones as saying, do my 'CVS branch' step first, since it is a move
in the general directon, but I am guessing I'm stretching your intentions.
Could you re-read and see that I meant, do a long lived CVS branch for
Traditional, whilst I clean-up CVS HEAD to be pure Python, prior to a future
SVN move.

ops, maybe I misunderstood your intentions.


And, besides, there is not that thousands of people updating their
descriptors anyway ;-)


Yeah, but concensus was -- if SVN was a barrier for anybody (and we know it
is becoming less and less w/ more projects in SVN) we ought keep metadata in
CVS for a while longer.

Ok, what about moving all the code to subversion and just keep the metadata in CVS? (at least for now)

People, comments?

--
Stefano.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to