On Wednesday 13 October 2004 22:52, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:

> I assumed that jdox was a typo for qdox, since the packages/jdox-1.5
> contained a qdox jar.

Fixed already?
There is no jdox ref in my Gump descriptors...


Cheers
Niclas
-- 
   +------//-------------------+
  / http://www.bali.ac        /
 / http://niclas.hedhman.org / 
+------//-------------------+


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to