> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 October 2004 13:11
> To: Gump code and data
> Subject: RE: Some progress on Fulcrum Component Builds!
>
> I am a little confused.. Why is the behavior of avalon-merlin-unit
> special/more difficult then any other dependency?
Over the last few months we have been working on getting everything very
consistent across the entire avalon codebase. As far as the merlin-unit
package is concerned there are the following changes that effect gump
dependencies.
1. the group/artifact name change
2. changes to the content of the jar file (the 3.3.0 version
is a composite jar that includes the dependent classes with
the single jar whereas the current HEAD version requires the
declaration of all dependencies (which is automatic in Magic
but a PITA otherwise)
The jar packaging changes were introduced due to complication reported
by users - as we were seeing conflicts with respect to bootstrap
classloader content. There is a solution to this in the pipeline with
will bring things back to a single dependency.
In the meantime I'm just chatting with niclas and we probably has a
solution for gump figured.
Cheers, Steve.
> Just as an FYI, my attempt to get fulcrum-crypto-api to build by
changing
> the dependency from avalon-merlin-unit to merlin-unit failed. I guess
> that
> was reasonable enough. So I have changed it back. However, I saw
this
> usage (taken from avalon-trunk.xml):
>
> <depend project="avalon-merlin-unit"><noclasspath/></depend>
>
> So, I added that into my fulcrum-crypto-api section.
>
> At any rate, now all the plugins seem to be installed for Maven and
those
> errors are gone.
>
> Eric
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 12:02 PM
> > To: 'Gump code and data'
> > Subject: RE: Some progress on Fulcrum Component Builds!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 15 October 2004 07:06
> > > To: Gump code and data
> > > Subject: Re: Some progress on Fulcrum Component Builds!
> > >
> > > On Friday 15 October 2004 07:45, Brett Porter wrote:
> > > > > > <depend project="avalon-merlin-unit"/> to <depend
> > > > > > project="merlin-unit"/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > :o)
> > > > >
> > > > > No, the project here refers to the name within Gump, but I
think
> > that
> > > the
> > > > > following is needed;
> > > > >
> > > > > <depend property="maven.jar.merlin-unit"
project="avalon-merlin-
> > > unit"/>
> > > > >
> > > > > Brett, do you have any insight in this?? Steve?
> > > >
> > > > AFAIK property is not needed. The gump plugin just generates:
> > > > <depend project="${dependency}" />
> > >
> > > Yes, but the Gump ID and the Maven ArtifactID must correspond, and
> > they
> > > don't
> > > in this case.
> >
> > Can we just put a symlink in place that links merlin-unit to
> > avalon-merlin-unit?.
> >
> > Steve.
> >
> > >
> > > Niclas
> > > --
> > > +------//-------------------+
> > > / http://www.bali.ac /
> > > / http://niclas.hedhman.org /
> > > +------//-------------------+
> > >
> > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
