This is not a rant, but constructive criticism.
1) as I mentioned already, I think that having gump (or forrest or whatever) generate static HTML pages creates more problems than it solves. I think we should move the architecture with something like this
metadata -> gump -> database -> jenny -> user
I agree. Keep in mind that
metadata -> gump -> database -> jenny <-\
^ |
| |
\---------- user <--------------------/it's worth thinking about workflow if you split things up, before you split things up. It could be that you want to have a "Jane" besides "Jenny", where Jane is used for modification of the metadata and execution of complex workflow activity. Or whatever.
Another minor comment: let's make sure we *brand* the whole thing as gump, not just a part of it.
cheers,
- Leo
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
