David Crossley wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
<snip/>
Cocoon didn't build 'cos (1) we'd not got enough folks caring about gump successes (2) we didn't build from repository (and cocoon has lots of dependencies, so it's chances of a build were unlikely. FWIIW: Communities (many), along with myself (looking at 'affected') and Stefan (just being the natural Gumpmeister) put in the time and effort in to picked candidate failures, fix them, and slowly edged up the Gump wave front to meet Cocoon. So, in a sense, this number resulted in Cocoon getting built. ;-)
all right, it is clearly not your fault that cocoon was never built, but this for sure didn't help, IMHO.
A tweet from the background ...
The email reports that nag us on Cocoon and Forrest are very hard for me to follow. (Please don't stop the nags.)
I do try to decipher them and even follow through to the website. However, i inevitably give up and wait.
Thank heaven that Stefan Bodewig and Stephen McConnell et al sometimes send us a fix for our gump descriptor. These fixes are often obscure.
So, please, it is not that we don't care.
How to ease the confusion, i do not know.
David,
first of all, I think forrest should really transfer control of their descriptor to the gump project.
You are the only ASF descriptor that does not validate against the DTDs that I finished last night.
[this is because Nicola's love into overdesign]
That would help gump help you.
-- Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
