> -----Original Message----- > From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 October 2004 10:26 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Fwd: Re: NoopInstrumentManager has moved incompatibly > > > > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > > Subject: Re: NoopInstrumentManager has moved incompatibly > Date: Thursday 21 October 2004 15:15 > From: Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Excalibur Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Question 1; Does James run out-of-the-box on Loom? > > James should run out of the box *IF* a few extra jars are added to the > deployment archive. > > > Question 2; Can/should we add Loom to the be built from source by Gump? > > It is possible but it may not add any value as the only part that james > would directly depend upon is the phoenix-api jar.
Just for reference - James does not depend on phoenix-api. Steve. > Loom uses the last > release of this from avalon which was probably the release of a few > years ago. It would be better to archive off phoenix, but maybe keep the > phoenix-api jar dependency around or something. NFI as I haven't looked > at the source for ages! > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
