On 2004-11-30 11:19:33, Eric Pugh wrote:
> Now, partly that may be a communication thing.. If Log4j fails, they get > emailed. If log4j breaks every body else, they don't... Without active > involvement by a group, the prospect of keeping things working becomes a > thankless task (witness Niclas's frustration). I thought "hey, I'll try > and help" and ran into, in an hour, the same frustration Niclas sees.. I am > not a committer (or even involved beyond the occasional email) with Log4j or > Velocity, so who do I got to prod for action?
This reminds me of a joke.
A bloke with rather unusual sexual abilities is invited to give a public demonstration. A large crowd gathers in an arena while the bloke does it with 1, then 2, then 3 consenting adults of the opposite sex. The crowd begins to chant 10, 11, .., 95. At the 96th the bloke gets tired. He makes a last ditch effort, 97 ... 98.
The crowd falls silent, and he makes it to 99. The 100th is too much for our bloke, who gives up. The crowd erupts yelling "Homosexual, Homesexual."
If at the slightest sign of breakage you are going to blame people for being unfriendly or obtuse, Gump will not succeed in bringing people closer together.
-- Ceki G�lc�
The complete log4j manual: http://qos.ch/eclm
Professional log4j support: http://qos.ch/log4jSupport
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
