At 03:44 PM 12/1/2004, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I think it's better if we start to nag ourselves first and see how we can increase the signal/noise ratio before we go back public.
It's not only about gump's signal/noise ratio but the attitude adopted when things break. Allowing unaware developers to become aware that things broke (or may brake) offers tangible benefits.
Once the dialog is triggered, it should go both ways. Depicting gump offenders as morons won't get us anywhere.
In the past, the social algorithm for gump has been:
1) Gump checks for dependency issues.
2) If gump detects problems, social pressure is applied on the offender until the offenders yield. Otherwise, the offender is depicted as an insensitive moron.
I suggest you review this social algorithm.
-- Stefano.
-- Ceki G�lc�
The complete log4j manual: http://qos.ch/eclm
Professional log4j support: http://qos.ch/log4jSupport
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
