On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 11 December 2004 01:08, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> Yes, it is Gump's fault, but then again it doesn't make any sense >> as a descriptor-element either. > > Btw, I do it myself all the time; When a testcase fail, it is easier > to remove the test ;o)
In this case it's more "I do understand the test language far better than the code". Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
