Just catching up on my email after being gone for a week. One thing that strikes me about the project id's is that this seems to continue the same discussion we have had in the past about maven generated project id's versus the gump project id's...
Do the project id's have to have meaning? While it's nice to look at a project id and pick out some data, like the version and the timestamp or what not, eventually gump will run into another project where the id's mean something different and are generated differently. I don't mind a project id like "787234" that I then look up and find out is what ever specific meaning it has. Like version, or host, or whatnot. I think that when we establish project naming conventions we'll run into conflicts with how other projects name themselves.... > I would welcome project IDs of the form > > http://www.apache.org/projects/cocoon > > and then > > http://www.apache.org/projects/cocoon#v1.0 > > for a particular released version, or > > http://www.apache.org/projects/cocoon#20041210 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
