> On Sunday 12 December 2004 04:40, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > > > all because dependencies have failed to build, but no nags on projects > > that > > > actually failed, such as; > > > > Yes, indeed. Could you forward a few (or all) of them to me, P2P please? > > done. don't think you want them all.
I just switched off e-mail from public Gump, 'cos I didn't have time to investigate the craziness, and then I took a quick peek at these mails. I see "configuration failed" and "pre-build failed" which are both correct messages to send. The "pre-build failed" means things like making directories, etc, it does not mean pre-requisites failed (as I believe you interpreted.) Does this explain all the mails you saw? BTW: After the first notification of failure we only send notification of failures once a day (during the official run). Could this explain your "no nags on projects that actually failed?" regards, Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
