On Monday 13 December 2004 16:24, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
I think at least Stefan(o) prefer Gump an approach where Gump can parse Maven POMs directly.
:o) Cool. But you are back to some of the problems listed for approach "1.", e.g. there are artifacts that are not inter-project consistent.
So, POM *alone* is not enough, but can remove the need for a "gump" goal in Maven.
Yep. POM alone is not enough, we should start thinking about a "registry of project names" on where everybody can agree upon.
Brett, what's your opinion on this?
-- Stefano.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
