"Curt Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Would there be any objections to attempting to create a logging-log4cxx > descriptor? The build might only assemble a source tar.gz, but if there > is a gcc on the box, we could use cpptasks to build log4cxx. I would not > expect to put the compilation products (libraries, etc) in the Gump output > files. > > Building log4cxx would require building Apache Portable Runtime, testing > would require building APR, CppUnit and boost::regex and I don't think we > want to take it that far, at least initially.
Well, Gump is currently building APR http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/apr/apr-make-install/index.html ;-). I haven't looked at log4cxx, but other than having to set up the dependancies, I don't see any reason not to have it making. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
