On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >>>I think it doesn't make sense that you can refer to something about >>>some project without depending on it. >> The only use-case I know is when you really only depend on the >> module, not the project (i.e. the home and srcdir type of >> references). > > ugh. Conceptually, that's a big nono. To me,
No problem with turning that into some kind of project dependency here. >> If we add module level dependency and more interesting types than >> "depend --> add the jars to CLASSPATH", we would address those >> issues. > > yep. This means you've been correct with your initial mail. We agree that we have work to do and we have no clear idea of how it is going to look in the end ;-) > (in graph theory speak, we can have arbitrarily colored edges) Yes, this will be necessary. We need to add more semantics to artifacts as well as dependencies. We completely agree here. >> I like things to be explicit, so I'd rather remove "<depend/> >> inside of <ant/>" completely and don't create any dependencies >> implicitly. But that may be just me - and I'm able to adapt 8-). > > no, it's not just you! Great. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
