On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At the moment, I don't think so. I hope that you can just add one > and gump won't fall over, just ignoring it instead, but I can't > really promise that.
The shell script/XSLT based "old" Gump would get into trouble with any attribute named href. It would try to replace the element that has the attribute withthe root element of a document loaded from that href. I don't think this is still true in current Gump, but may be something to watch out for. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
