> If you think of a Project as a node, a Dependency as a vertex, then you
can
> have an array of DependencyInfo as multiple vertex colorings. Was my
> thinking.
I sorta got it, but I guess I was thinking based upon existing Gump
metadata/documentation. I had no metadata sample for Ant, so built it based
upon what I knew.
> It doesn't make sense to do enumerations inside an xml attribute. It's
much
> clearer to make enumerations by well, enumerating elements.
>
> (...)
>
> Anyway, I guess the code isn't as clear as I thought it was. Similarly I
> couldn't quite figure out what you were trying to do in your commit,
further
> indication that this really needs more change than you introduced :-D
>
> Any suggestion on how to clean this up further?
We miscommunicated based of what I believed the XML to be, and applying my
read of the code to that input. I (honestly) can't tell you which form is
better ('ids' w/ N or N of <depend 'id') but I lean towards yours. Let's
restore it to your way, and then create some good sample XML metadata. I
need a small stack of dependencies (up to an <ant command, not a <script
command ) to work on ClasspathPlugin and AntPlugin.
BTW: If we are changing metadata, let's fix it so that we know what is Ant
over Java not Ant over (say) C# or whatever.
regards,
Adam
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
