thanks adam. i was looking into the code myself when i saw ur email :)
will wait for ur patch (both trunk and live...right?)
-- dims
On 4/26/05, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Could it be that the new "Kill prcess group" stuff is killing too many
> > processes, taking the main Gump process down with it?
>
> I don't think it is the new stuff, per-se, but the fact that some old
> slipped in with the new. The old killed "the Gump process" 'cos it was
> running within a standalone process, a copy ('cos M$ doesn't have fork).
> Inside the new, I suspect that the fork still sees 'the Gump process' as the
> original. Poorly coded, and when mixed with a coincident bug, perhaps fatal.
>
> I would've expected to see a log warning line (that I don't see in your
> output) but since this possibility exists, and fits the experience we have,
> I'm inclined to blame it. I'll fix it and commit.
>
> regards,
>
> Adam
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
