On Wed, 04 May 2005, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A preliminary conclusion seems to be that gump-on-vmware performance > is quite acceptable.
Cool. > clearly, disk space management on brutus could be a little tighter, Are you "publishing" jars in the VmGump instance? They can eat a good bit of disk space. > And the recommended setup is something like this: > > * dual 3+ GHz CPU > * 4GB ram > * 100GB of fast disk (I'm guessing esp. access time matters) > * internal gigabit connection to cvs and svn server > > on which you could comfortably run all our profiles on top of vmware > and have some room for growth. More disk wouldn't hurt either (I want Mustang nightly and IKVM.NET builds ;-). > Gump on Dual G5 setup > ===================== > Gump3 anyone? :-) Maqybe you want to play on moof first? It is available right now. > What do you guys think? Comments? All sounds fine. I agree with your list of Gump requirements as well as where we might be able to scale down. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
