I suspect Leo is either (1) swamped or (2) practicing "I'm only one Gumper, not the oracle, so figuring it out as a group is best" or (3) both. As such, I say go for it, and we'll try to compress disk requirements to fit. I suspect we'll fit two (just) and I'm game for the second to be Kaffe.
[We can ask #INFRA for a tad more disk on this VM if we get squeezed too tight, but it'd be a new location/drive (since I don't believe VMWare ESX allows us to grow disks).] Or, if you are more patient than I ;-), wait and see what Leo was thinking when he chatted to #infra folks about vmgump. regards, Adam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gump code and data" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:49 AM Subject: kaffe on vmgump Leo, So what's the latest situation on vmgump? are the results published yet? (jdk1.4?) Can we set up an instance that runs on kaffe? (Adam created my id, so i can help). thanks, dims -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
