Adam R. B. Jack wrote: >>I'm halfway torn between throwing history away and simply importing >>CVS HEAD manually and doing a trunk-only conversion. Well, not really >>true, I'd probably prefer keeping the history, but could live without >>it. What's your preference? > > > +1 for keep the history. > > >>The second question is, where should our metadata end up in SVN? >>Probably in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata/trunk - I >>envision metadata branches for Gump3 later, so I'd be against a flat >>structure like site currently has. > > > +1 in theory, 'cos looking at our SVN tree we do seem to use /gump/X/trunk > when we have a sub-project X, but see below. > > Since today folks (1) checkout Gump from SVN and (2) checkout metadata from > CVS into ./metadata, I don't see a hardship of having two places. That said, > will SVN allow us to do this w/o pain?
of course, svn:external is your friend :-) > Can we have an empty > /repos/asf/gump/trunk/metadata become a local working directory, and then > checkout /repos/asf/gump/metadata/trunk into it? I suspect not. I think we > "got away with it" because we were using two separate SCMs. Something will > have to give, I'm just not sure what, i.e. (1) no empty ./metadata w/ a > FILLME.txt (2) ../metadata not ./metadata (3) not separate SVN trees. > Thoughts? > > regards, > > Adam > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Stefano. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
