On 9/1/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 06:09 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > the original plan was to try to run two gump builds until the > > > mavenised one was debugged. however, since the original run is no > > > longer running very well, i suppose that there may be an argument > > > for biting the bullet and moving now. > > > > I wouldn't expect the Maven run to work any better or worse than the > > Ant one, so go ahead if you feel like it. > > > > The main problems we have with mavenized projects in Gump are > > > > (1) artifact-Id mismatches > > > > (2) projects depending on Maven plugins that are not (yet) installed > > on the Gump machines. > > > > The second point somewhat bothers me since we have a few builds that > > don't run just because a plugin that we wouldn't use for our builds is not > > installed. But that's just me disagreeing with Maven's worldview 8-) > > i agree that this is a little bit bothersome. > > i wonder whether it's not so much a problem with the worldview as a > lacking feature. i don't know how to specify plugin dependencies for a > maven build (so they could be automatically downloaded). without this > feature, the build is not truly automatic or replicable.
Same way you specify any dependencies I thought. Problem is that Gump builds in --offline mode, so it doesn't download anything. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
