It seems we traded junit for commons-lang..
Maybe adding a jdk compatibility mode could be interesting to use / add (didn't look if this is
working though) ?
Mvgr,
Martin
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is to "solve" the junit stuff right?
JUnit is the most prominent project to require Java 5 ATM, but hardly
the only one. We've had other projects breaking for months now
because we didn't provide a Java 5 environment.
I'm personally not happy with how effectively there's this one
project run by a bunch of people who don't particulary understand
enough about backwards compatibility
I don't think you are fair here. JUnit 4 uses a completely different
approach that has been enabled by annotations. I'm a happy NUnit user
(.NET unit testing framework) and can tell you that using annotations
really is a step forward over the JUnit 3.x approach.
And when it comes to backwards compatibility, it is very likely that
all our JUnit 3.8 tests in Gump will work with JUnit 4 as well. It's
simply that JUnit wants to use annotations and the only way forward
was to require Java 5 at compile time.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
