David Saff wrote:
Is it customary to manually send a note when a project has been fixed in
CVS? Or is the fix itself sufficient? Is this the right place to send
such a note?
Welcome to the Gump mailing list, David
Usually a project is left to worry about its own problems; gump is just
a facility to build and test against CVS/SVN head versions of other
people's stuff.
Where the mailing list comes more into play is finding out why your code
suddenly stops working even when you havent changed anything; when a
change in something common like ant, log4j or xerces can switch half the
projects into red-build-state.
It's also the place to get tweaks done to your gump descriptor, like
switch to a different CVS branch, build some different artifacts, or
have the email alias changed. Or to ask why you keep getting told off
for a broken build, when it should be working.
> Regardless, JUnit was broken last night. It should be fixed now.
Thanks,
>
the 162 direct dependees will appreciate the fix. There may actually be
more, as if you depend on ant you implicitly get junit for free.
-steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
