"Elliot Metsger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Jan.Materne wrote: >> >> Gump _could_ use a fix version of Castor. But that's more an intend of a >> Continous _Build_ Server, >> not a Continous _Integration_ Server like Gump. >> > >Thanks for the clarification Jan. If my inital email wasn't a dead >giveaway, I know next to nothing about Gump. > > >Jan.Materne wrote: >> >> Gump should show, that a project is failing because it is not compatible >> with the latest version of >> another project. >> > >I agree with your points. Indeed, Gump has demonstrated its value to > >Pluto >on occaison. Most recently we upgraded from commons-fileupload 1.0 to 1.1 >based on Gump messages. > >However, the failed build due to Castor is somewhat different. With >commons-fileupload, we realized that upgrading to 1.1 was the best course >of >action. But, we probably aren't ever going to change the Pluto 1.0.2's >dependency on Castor, so we are going to continue to receive the nag > >emails >to pluto-dev indefinitly. > >I'm wondering if there is a way that we can silence those emails concerning >Castor. Otherwise people on the list will forward the Gump messages to >/dev/null (which is a bad thing of course). > We can set up a packaged-castor project and change Pluto to <depend /> on it. If you can send the download URL for the version you want, I can set it up (probably tomorrow, unless somebody else on the list feels an itch :). Of course, you can turn off the nags at any time, but it doesn't sound like this is what you want. >Thanks for your help, >Elliot > >Jan > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
