On Feb 20, 2007, at 10:50 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The nant project fails and I'm guessing that Gump is executable a
fallback behavior to run an previously installed version of NAnt.
No, Gump doesn't do anything like that. Unfortunately.
Gump picks up NAnt.exe from PATH, that's it. Even though I've written
(well, pasted together would be closer to the truth) the NAnt specific
code in Gump, I can't remember whether it has ever really been used at
all. It may very well be possible that it doesn't work as advertized.
However, Mono just installs a /usr/bin/nant symbolic link which
would not be invoked if NAnt.exe was invoked.
Why should it? Running "mono NAnt.exe" should work just fine.
Stefan
Gump's <nant> builder doesn't seem to exec "mono NAnt.exe", it just
execs "NAnt.exe" which isn't an executable or on the path on a Mono
install (at least on Mac OS/X). If the builder were changed to just
exec "nant" or a symlink were added that redirected NAnt.exe to /usr/
bin/nant then it would likely get a little further. On Mac OS/X, /
usr/bin/nant is just a little more complicated than "mono
NAnt.exe" (it sets an environment variable too).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
