On 08/09/2009, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2009-09-08, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 08/09/2009, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 2009-09-08, <s...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>> No longer using Ant build now that Jexl 2.0 is the trunk version > >>> Initial stab at M2 build > > >>>> <mvn basedir="jexl"/> > >>>> <!-- Does it need a jar tag? --> > > >> If anybody depends on it and is supposed to use the generated jar, yes. > > > It's used by Jelly. > > > But what should it be? > > > I don't think I understand the question. The <jar> element should point > to the jar created by the build process. Given that we don't have any > influence on the jar name in mvn builds, you must use the (-SNAPSHOT) > version of the POM - and update the jar element whenever the POM is > changed. >
OK, thanks, that's what I meant. I'll update it shortly. > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@gump.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@gump.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@gump.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@gump.apache.org
