On 2010-05-05, Bill Barker <billwbar...@verizon.net> wrote:

>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=941172&view=rev
>> Log:
>> what would break if we removed the old apr-util branch?

> Urm, pretty much every thing.  The problem is that current
> apr-util/trunk won't build with apr/trunk.

My understanding is that APR-util has been merged into APR - there is no
apr-util trunk at all.

> We could provide a legacy apr build to fix this in the meantime, but
> not really the Gump Way.

This is what I'm trying to find out.  Do the httpd and log4cpp builds
assume apr-util was a separate build or not?  If they still do, we'll
need a packaged version of apr-util IMHO.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@gump.apache.org

Reply via email to