2012/3/28 Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>: > On 2012-03-18, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > >> 2012/3/16 Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>: >>> Hi, > >>> maybe somebody with more experience with hg than myself can help. > >>> With the upgrade of the the FreeBSD jail gump is now using Mercurial 2.1 >>> there. Since them most if not all hg updates are failing. The reason >>> is (quoting "hg help pull") > >>> ,---- >>> | Returns 0 on success, 1 if no changes found or an update had >>> unresolved >>> | files. >>> `---- > >>> so Gump can no longer tell a "pull" that didn't change anything from one >>> that failed (I'm sure there is an explanation why mixing "nothing to do" >>> with "things have failed" is not silly). > >> Searching about this issue, I see that people say that the old >> behaviour was restored in Mercurial 2.1.1 (released 2012-03-01). > > Thanks, I didn't search myself. > >>> (...) > I don't have any idea if/when FreeBSD may update hg. >
Just searching Ports catalog at freebsd.org, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=^mercurial-2.1.1&stype=name shows that 2.1.1 does exist and apparently was released just today (March 28). (Well, I do not know much about FreeBSD, so no clue whether this can be used as is, or how long you'd have to wait. Just some good news). Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@gump.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@gump.apache.org
