The UCSD results are very impressive, especially given their hardware
budget.
I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure there were no Hadoop based entries
this year - I know we at Yahoo! didn't enter.
Couple of points:
# The Indy category is a benchmark to sort fixed length records, not a
_general_ sort benchmark i.e. Daytona.
# Our _best_ result missed the deadline by a whisker last year, but we
eventually did 100Tb sort in 95 mins and a 1000TB (1PB) in 975 mins
(16.25 hrs) - which worked out to be just over 1.0 TB/min, which was
nearly twice as fast as the record attributed to us. (http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/2009/05/hadoop_sorts_a_petabyte_in_162.html
)
Arun
On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Abhishek Verma wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Hadoop was not involved. You can find more details here :
http://sortbenchmark.org/tritonsort_2010_May_15.pdf
and all the records and their information here : http://sortbenchmark.org/
<http://sortbenchmark.org/>-Abhishek.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Maxim Veksler <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
Anyone knows if Hadoop is involved? And if so what is the
configuration for
such cluster?
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/science/07-27DataWorld.asp
Thank you,
Maxim.
