Finally got some time to review this in detail. I don't understand these 2:
1) [snip] > * Approvals > > These are the types of approvals that can be sought. Different actions > require different types of approvals > > * Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes > and no binding vetoes. [snip] > * Actions > > This section describes the various actions which are undertaken within > the project, the corresponding approval required for that action and > those who have binding votes over the action. > > * Code Change > > A change made to a codebase of the project and committed > by a committer. This includes source code, documentation, website > content, etc. > > Lazy consensus of active committers. Is the intention then that all code changes need an explicit +1 from 3 committers? That's what this bylaw says. 2) > * Modifying Bylaws > > Modifying this document. > > Majority of active PMC members Was this intended to be lazy majority? You stated that 'all votes are lazy' but this one is not. Cheers, Nige
