On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Chris Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > Calling it something other than Hadoop would avoid confusing users > (and HBase could then release bug fixes, etc. on its own schedule), > but from how it's been described: this is acknowledging the reality of > the situation, not proposing something radical. >
Calling it other than Hadoop would only confuse the situation even more; "Trust all your data to fooFS!". It'd also reeks of HDFS 'fork' (HBase is not yet up for taking on such a burden). I liked my original reading of your suggestion Chris -- even if it was perhaps not what you intended -- where HBase would host hadoop-0.20-append. Thats not on? St.Ack P.S. Arun, I agree.
