Thanks! Don't worry, we should make this clear on the site. I apologize, I didn't mean to spam the list with my suggestion!
On Jan 6, 2011, at 4:57 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > sorry everyone. I have subscribed to hdfs-users list and will discuss > this there. > > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Harsh J <[email protected]> wrote: >> No, he meant to move the discussion to the [email protected] >> list for HDFS queries. >> >> Sending to hdfs-user, bcc'ing to general. [This the right way?] >> >> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Mag Gam <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The current filesystem is in HDFS. >>> >>> Do you mean, create a new namenode on the new server and assign some >>> data nodes to it and start moving the data off? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> could you move this traffic to HDFS? >>>> >>>> thanks! >>>> >>>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>>> >>>>> What is the correct procedure to move to a new namenode? My current >>>>> namenode is running on a 2 core with 4gb of memory. I am moving to a >>>>> new host, 8 core x 32 GB of memory. My question are: what is the >>>>> proper way to move to the new namenode, and what can I do to enhance >>>>> the performance of it since the new hardware is much superior than the >>>>> old one. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Harsh J >> www.harshj.com >>
