+1. I downloaded the bits, compiled and ran unit tests. Also, looked at the source code to some extent. Looks good.
-dhruba On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 4, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you don't > > change your development and release model on a release VOTE thread, > > you change it on a DISCUSSION thread. > > That is no different than saying you have a right to veto a > release until the issue is addressed, which you don't have. > > A release vote is a majority decision. If the majority > decides to release, then whatever gets released will define > the new norm by which policies are assumed. If not released, > then I suggest collaborating more on the policies before > trying to vote again. > > Either way, we don't hold up a vote for the sake of a > policy discussion because voting is a more efficient > means of discovering if the policy really matters. > > ....Roy > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
