> I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How > about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part > of the docs?
-1 Please don't check in anything before having a vote. Thanks. Nicholas ________________________________ From: Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 9:36:25 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 23:40, Eli Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote: >> One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about the >> release manager role >>(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%[email protected]%3E). >>. >> In light of today's disagreements, I think we should restart this >> discussion and incorporate these rules into the bylaws, since it >> formalizes our practices. >> >> I'm happy to drive this. We could start by discussing Chris' proposal >> (see clarifications in >>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%[email protected]%3E), >>, >> then when we get consensus we can put the document on the website. >> (BTW does anyone know if the bylaws were checked into SVN anywhere? >> These belong together.) > > Sounds good to me. I like Chris' proposal, he was clear that "nothing > should be in (unreleased) 0.x that isn't also in trunk." so that may > needs to be revisited if we want to be consistent with today's vote. > > I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How > about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part > of the docs? Eg this is how Pig does it: > http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html +1 makes sense. > > Thanks, > Eli >
