+1 (non-binding). Sounds good to me. --Matt
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Devaraj Das <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes... I meant the LTC. > > On Aug 2, 2011, at 1:23 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Eli, > > > > I hope we don't have to remove the TaskTracker *grin*. > > > > Devaraj/Allen, > > > > You mean LinuxTaskController only, right ? > > > > The default is DefaultTaskController, which is not relevant to these > > discussions. > > > > +1. This is the easiest way to get 0.22.0 out. > > > > - Milind > > --- > > Milind Bhandarkar > > Greenplum Labs, EMC > > > > > > > > > > On 8/2/11 1:07 PM, "Devaraj Das" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +1 to removing the TaskController code for the 0.22 release. > >> > >> In the MR-279 branch, the security issues identified in MAPREDUCE-2178 > >> have been taken care of (to my knowledge). > >> > >> On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Eli Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:19 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> Having talked to various folks in the community about their > >>>>> willingness to > >>>>> stabilize and use 0.22 and make it production-quality, here is what I > >>>>> propose: > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. Cut a release 0.22.0 without mapreduce-2178 patch, with > >>>>> hadoop.security.authentication set to simple (I.e. No > authentication). > >>>>> Make sure that MR-2178 is highlighted as known-issue in the top-level > >>>>> dir > >>>>> (create a KNOWN-ISSUES.txt ?), and carry out a vote. > >>>>> > >>>>> 2. Later, when MR-2178 patch is committed, cut a release for 0.22.1. > >>>>> (I > >>>>> have heard of folks working on it, but no date commitments yet.) > >>>>> > >>>>> The reason a 0.22.0 release should happen, IMHO, even without > >>>>> MR-2178, is > >>>>> that the other components of Hadoop stack (e.g. Pig, hbase, hive etc) > >>>>> will > >>>>> have a release to test against, and fix any issues for > >>>>> incompatibility. > >>>>> Also, for folks who do not use kerberos authentication (>90% of the > >>>>> hadoop > >>>>> users, to my knowledge), it will be a release closest to trunk, with > >>>>> HDFS > >>>>> appends. Plus, any issues found in the HDFS part of the release would > >>>>> be > >>>>> directly applicable to the trunk and other future releases. (Not so > >>>>> about > >>>>> map-reduce, which will undergo major surgery in trunk because of > >>>>> MR-279.) > >>>>> > >>>>> Thoughts ? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Sounds reasonable to me. #1 is what we did for the 0.21 release. > >>> > >>> Actually, I didn't read close enough. For 0.21 we actually removed the > >>> task tracker, think it makes sense to do that here as well. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Eli > >> > >> > > > >
