This time it seems easy to split the difference here. - Sufficient interest in Bigtop so announcements and discussions can/should go to general@.*
- There is no need to (and a request not to) inject exhortations to participate in Bigtop into random other topics on general@, such as status reports by another project or group. Simply create new threads to discuss Bigtop matters. * - Seems to me a community effort to qualify an integrated stack top to bottom is a good thing, but I question doing this for 0.22, which nobody is going to use much, or so I hear. Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) >________________________________ >From: Konstantin Shvachko <shv.had...@gmail.com> >To: general@hadoop.apache.org >Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 2:23 AM >Subject: Re: Update on hadoop-0.23 > >On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler ><eri...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> Hi Doug, Jeff, Roman >> >> I'd like to request that folks take bigtop project discussions onto >> the bigtop lists and don't greet status reports on general@hadoop > >I am personally very interested in the results of testing of 0.22 with >BigTop, or other tools, or without any tools. >So I'd like to ask (rather than request) good people to continue >posting your findings on the general@hadoop list. > >Eric, thank you for your continuous contributions to Apache Hadoop. > >I also think that general@hadoop is the right place to discuss >inter-project issues like making HBase, Pig, Hive, >working on Hadoop 0.22 and 0.23. Where else? > >Thanks, >--Konstantin > > >
