On Nov 1, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 11/01/2011 03:48 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> -1 This is not a release tarball that folks can vote on, since it >> contains no source code. Please cancel this vote and start a new vote >> on an actual source code tarball. > > Okay, I found source code in 8 embedded jars: >
No worries, I'm cancelling this vote to roll an rc1. Arun > % find hadoop-0.23.0 -name '*-sources.jar' > hadoop-0.23.0/hadoop-mapreduce-examples-0.23.0-sources.jar > hadoop-0.23.0/share/hadoop/common/hadoop-common-0.23.0-test-sources.jar > hadoop-0.23.0/share/hadoop/common/hadoop-common-0.23.0-sources.jar > hadoop-0.23.0/share/hadoop/hdfs/hadoop-hdfs-0.23.0-test-sources.jar > hadoop-0.23.0/share/hadoop/hdfs/hadoop-hdfs-0.23.0-sources.jar > hadoop-0.23.0/hadoop-mapreduce-test-0.23.0-sources.jar > hadoop-0.23.0/hadoop-mapreduce-tools-0.23.0-sources.jar > hadoop-0.23.0/hadoop-mapreduce-0.23.0-sources.jar > > It's awkward at best to build and run tools like RAT on such a release. > I'd much prefer a tarball that directly includes a buildable > source-file tree, more-or-less an 'svn export' to vote on. Folks should > not primarily evaluate binaries when voting. The ASF primarily produces > and publishes source-code so voting artifacts should be optimized for > evaluation of that. End-user artifacts should be generated by the > source code. > > Doug
