On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > On the other hand, it does suck for users if they update from "1.x" to > "2.x" and they end up losing some bug fixes or features they > previously were running.
Keep in mind that nobody's proposing to rename .22 branch into 2 right away. This will be addressed at a later point during one of the (hopefully) regular releases off of that branch. Reserving branch-2 version slot is cheap and IMHO doesn't complicate anything. It does, however, give .22 branch a right to mature. Thanks, Roman.
