My vote is (3). -dhruba
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:15 PM, <milind.bhandar...@emc.com> wrote: > My (non-binding) vote is: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 > > - milind > > >On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > > >> We've discussed several options: > >> > >> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > >> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > >>hole. > >> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. > >>2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively > >>postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > >> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > >> > >> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > >> > >> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > >> > >> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > >> > >> The vote will run the normal 7 days. > >> > >> thanks, > >> Arun > >> > >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > >> > > > > > > -- Subscribe to my posts at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
