Eli, is this done so I can roll rc1? On May 14, 2012, at 1:32 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> As soon as jira is back up and I can post an updated patch I'll merge > HDFS-3418 (also incompatible). > > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote: >> I just have merged HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366. I also have merged >> HDFS-3211 since it is an incompatible protocol change (without it, >> 2.0.0-alphaand 2.0.0 will be incompatible.) >> >> Tsz-Wo >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Cc: >> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:07 AM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha >> >> Let me merge HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366. Thanks. >> Tsz-Wo >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Uma Maheswara Rao G <[email protected]> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Cc: >> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 10:56 AM >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha >> >>> a) Revert HDFS-3157 and commit HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366 on >>> branch-2.0.0-alpha, so these are the only changes since rc0. Roll a >>> new rc1 from here. >> I have merged HDFS-3157 revert. >> Do you mind taking a look at HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366? >> >> Thanks, >> Uma >> ________________________________________ >> From: Arun C Murthy [[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 10:24 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha >> >> Todd, >> >> Please go ahead and merge changes into branch-2.0.0-alpha and I'll roll RC1. >> >> thanks, >> Arun >> >> On May 12, 2012, at 10:05 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> Looking at the release tag vs the current state of branch-2, I have >>> two concerns from the point of view of HDFS: >>> >>> 1) We reverted HDFS-3157 in branch-2 because it sends deletions for >>> corrupt replicas without properly going through the "corrupt block" >>> path. We saw this cause data loss in TestPipelinesFailover. So, I'm >>> nervous about putting it in a release, even labeled as alpha. >>> >>> 2) HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366 changed the wire format for the RPC >>> envelope in branch-2, but didn't make it into this rc. So, that would >>> mean that future alphas would not be protocol-compatible with this >>> alpha. Per a discussion a few weeks ago, I think we all were in >>> agreement that, if possible, we'd like all 2.x to be compatible for >>> client-server communication, at least (even if we don't support >>> cross-version for the intra-cluster protocols) >>> >>> Do other folks think it's worth rolling an rc1? I would propose either: >>> a) Revert HDFS-3157 and commit HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366 on >>> branch-2.0.0-alpha, so these are the only changes since rc0. Roll a >>> new rc1 from here. >>> or: >>> b) Discard the current branch-2.0.0-alpha and re-branch from the >>> current state of branch-2. >>> >>> -Todd >>> >>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Eli Collins <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> +1 I installed the build on a 6 node cluster and kicked the tires, >>>> didn't find any blocking issues. >>>> >>>> Btw in the future better to build from the svn repo so the revision is >>>> an svn rev from the release branch. Eg 1336254 instead of 40e90d3c7 >>>> which is from the git mirror, this way we're consistent across >>>> releases. >>>> >>>> hadoop-2.0.0-alpha $ ./bin/hadoop version >>>> Hadoop 2.0.0-alpha >>>> Subversion >>>> git://devadm900.cc1.ygridcore.net/grid/0/dev/acm/hadoop-trunk/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common >>>> -r 40e90d3c7e5d71aedcdc2d9cc55d078e78944c55 >>>> Compiled by hortonmu on Wed May 9 16:19:55 UTC 2012 >>>> From source with checksum 3d9a13a31ef3a9ab4b5cba1f982ab888 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Arun C Murthy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I've created a release candidate for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would like >>>>> to release. >>>>> >>>>> It is available at: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc0/ >>>>> >>>>> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org. >>>>> >>>>> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days. >>>>> >>>>> This is a big milestone for the Apache Hadoop community - congratulations >>>>> and thanks for all the contributions! >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> Arun >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Arun C. Murthy >>>>> Hortonworks Inc. >>>>> http://hortonworks.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >> -- >> Arun C. Murthy >> Hortonworks Inc. >> http://hortonworks.com/ >> -- Arun C. Murthy Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/
