Woah, I'm gone for one day and miss out a lot of fun - thank god for little mercies! :)
A couple of quick responses before I need to run again... > However, contrary appeals to emotional reasoning citing "exclusion" or > a "lack of trust in contributors" are lazy and invalid. The proposal > is a dry partitioning for a specific, administrative purpose: to be > transparent about criteria to be included in a Yarn I thought I already did, but my bad - apologies. Looks like a couple of people asked, here you go: I included everyone with 20 patches and then, on Tom's suggestion, anyone with 10 commits - both for a period of 18 months. (The list doesn't change if we go with a filter of 15 patches for the same period.) Is thought it was a reasonably small bar, no? Should we go higher? Regarding why this wasn't discussed before, not sure - but we are discussing now after Tom asked to make up. And boy, are we *discussing*! :) Arun
