Nearly there: http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2-blockers
YARN-217 should be easy, I'd also like to get in YARN-253. Arun On Dec 19, 2012, at 1:15 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Any news on how this is progressing? Some folks in this thread below > inquired about getting this release out around the New Year timeframe, > but it looks like YARN-117 subtasks have gone pretty quiet. We all > know how long lifecycle changes can take to get pushed through ;-) > > -Todd > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Steve Loughran > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I want to make some changes to the lifecycle of a yarn service (in a >> backwards compatible way). >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-117 >> >> >> 1. formal state machine model with stop state idempotent and entry-able >> from any state >> 2. waiting/blocked state a service can enter when waiting for something >> else >> 3. an alternate base class that does the state model checks before >> executing any state change functions -currently its done at >> end-of-operation in the super() calls. >> 4. gradual move of services to the stricter base class. >> >> With a new base class nothing will break (as the move can be done >> case-by-case, leaving the heavily subclassed ones alone); the state model >> extensions & formalisation would be visible but not used. >> >> I don't want to hold anything up, because I need more testing of things >> before this is ready for review. I just want to get the fixes in before it >> ships >> >> On 19 November 2012 16:22, Robert Evans <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I am OK with removing the alpha assuming that we think that the APIs are >>> stable enough that we are willing to truly start maintaining backwards >>> compatibility on them within 2.X. From what I have seen I think that they >>> are fairly stable and I think there is enough adoption by other projects >>> right now that breaking backwards compatibility would be problematic. >>> >>> --Bobby Evans >>> >>> On 11/16/12 11:34 PM, "Stack" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Aaron T. Myers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi Arun, >>>>> >>>>> Given that the 2.0.3 release is intended to reflect the growing >>>>> stability >>>>> of YARN, and the QJM work will be included in 2.0.3 which provides a >>>>> complete HDFS HA solution, I think it's time we consider removing the >>>>> "-alpha" label from the release version. My preference would be to >>>>> remove >>>>> the label entirely, but we could also perhaps call it "-beta" or >>>>> something. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think it fine after two minor releases undoing the '-alpha' suffix. >>>> >>>> If folks insist we next go to '-beta', I'd hope we'd travel all >>>> remaining 22 letters of the greek alphabet before we 2.0.x. >>>> >>>> St.Ack >>> >>> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera -- Arun C. Murthy Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/
