On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Arun C Murthy <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe we can disregard MAPREDUCE-4820 since MAPREDUCE-4549 is already in > branch-2. FYI.
Arun, that very well may be the case -- let me take a closer look and report back (on the JIRA). Also, any chance you could comment on when the branch can be cut? It would make verification of things MAPREDUCE-4820 so much easier. Thanks, Roman.
