+1 Also, if "lazy" means that no explicit voting is done, then the other uses of "lazy" in the Hadoop bylaws are incorrect and should be removed (in a separate vote at this point).
Doug On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Robert Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > As per Aaron's request I am starting a new voting thread to make it obvious > that there is a vote happening. > > I propose that we change the term "lazy consensus" to "consensus approval" > (aka s/lazy\s+consensus/consensus approval/gi) in the bylaws so that it > matches the terms used in the apache foundation glossary. No actual change > to our voting would take place, just the term we use to describe that voting. > > As per the by-laws this would take a "lazy majority" of active PMC members > (although others are encouraged to speak up). > > Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and more > binding +1 votes than -1 votes. > > Voting lasts 7 days, so it closes Monday April 1st (But this is not a joke). > > I am +1 (binding) > > --Bobby
